Page 1 of 1
FOR statement - documentation missing 2 versions
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2021 11:25 pm
by p-OS
Besides the 3 versions of the FOR statement listed in the documentation (chapter 11.4) there exist two more !
For <var> = <expr1>,<expr2> [Step <expr3>] <loop-block> Next
Code: Select all
For i=1,10 Step 2
DebugPrint(i)
Next
Code: Select all
For i=1,10 Step 2 Do DebugPrint(i)
Both will print
Re: FOR statement - documentation missing 2 versions
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2021 5:36 pm
by plouf
isnt the the 3 "generic version" describes it ?
yes i know is not pretty clean the way it is written, but i think its the "3"
Re: FOR statement - documentation missing 2 versions
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2021 9:43 pm
by p-OS
No, the generic FOR statement has two variables , separated by comma , to be used as run variable/control variable.
My variants however have two values/vars, separated by comma, that define the start and end of the run. Thus the comma is an alternative to the TO keyword.
The second difference:
My variants do not support the local keyword.
Re: FOR statement - documentation missing 2 versions
Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2021 7:19 pm
by airsoftsoftwair
Those are not official so you use them at your own risk
